

Stine Høholt : CLOCKWISE New Nordic
Contemporary Art Introduction
 

THE NINE CONTEMPORARY
ARTISTS featured in the CLOCKWISE exhibition all work in extension
of late 20th-century neo-conceptual avant-garde currents. At the same
time, in highly different ways, they debate tendencies and currents
in cultural development, relating to what, in a threadbare phrase,
is known as "globalization". While firmly anchored in an art-historical
tradition, they venture into an expanded cultural field where artistic
practices target anthropological and sociological issues rather than
aesthetics and form. Whether melancholy or humorous, the works constitute
an ethnographic mapping of cultural fields that, directly or indirectly,
have been shaped by a new, international order. They deal with the
effects of globalization, not just on society as a whole but on the
individual.
The works in CLOCKWISE let cultural mobility, deficient identification
and fleeting encounters coexist with various forms of "introversion",
focusing on personal memory, on attempts to forge identity from a
diverse and conflicting cultural heritage. Other forms of introversion
appear in works that appropriate the often parodic-platitudinous9
8 traces of an "own" culture or investigate the uniquely Nordic at
a time when it no longer constitutes the self-evident source of individual
identity.
The exhibition shows a differentiated Nordic space in the contemporary
visual arts. The works were selected to display diversity rather than
uniformity, both with regard to the range of media and the diversity
of cultural perspectives. But above all, the artists show different
ways of relating to today's mobility, internationalization and the
new subcultural communities that are emerging as traditional national
and cultural ties become relativized.
AS ANY LOCAL NEWSPAPER READER will know, a growing cultural exchange
is taking place between the Nordic countries and the rest of the world,
not least by way of immigration. Equally important, though less debated,
is the temporal and spatial "truncation" produced by cultural and
especially technological developments over the past 50 years.
Mass media enable a global brand-name culture with associated pop
and sports icons to imprint our consciousness with hitherto unforeseen
force. Meanwhile, subcultures of various sorts are blurring affiliations
to geographic-cultural regions techno and hip-hop cultures are the
most visible examples of this but far from the only ones. In this
sense as well, the Nordic region has become part of an overriding
global reality.
In the Nordic countries, "ethnicity" and "cultural identity" have
mainly been defined by the political right, in relation to refugees
and immigrants. Bluntly put, the Nordic countries have been looking
down their nose at a perceived threat from the south. However, today's
political reaction does not just take aim at globalization's mobility,
it is equally directed at modernity's erosion of cultural communities.
At issue is often a critique of modernity: people reacting critically
to society's rationalization, disciplining and increasingly incomprehensible
structures by harking back to pre-modern communities or looking outward
to the new subcultures of globalization. In that regard, "the old
North" was a nostalgic vision already before immigration kicked into
high gear in the 1960s.
However, there has been very little looking within, to the indigenous
Nordic identity, or to the side, to international youth and subcultures,
in discussing the effects of globalization on the Nordic countries.
They, too, should be included in the debate of how cultural identity
is changing within a Nordic context. In what ways does cultural globalization
challenge, enrich and alter our Nordic identity and affiliations?
There are no easy answers to this question, especially if one has
only a vague notion or perhaps none at all of what is genuinely
Nordic "in itself", as the case is with the several generations now
that have grown up with American music on the radio and Chinese slippers
on their feet.
The exhibited works point to the need for a cultural self-reflexivity,
an act of questioning oneself and one's culture, with no prepackaged
answers in stock. Moreover, in these artists' self-reflexivity lies
an opportunity to glimpse the differentiation and nuances of the Nordic
identity. And, accordingly, the potential, within an art context,
to add facets to the debate about immigration, subcultures and the
new internationalization.
CULTURAL SELF-REFLEXIVITY AND A MELANCHOLY MAPPING of certain contemporary
cultural environments characterize the work of Finnish photographer
Jouko Lehtola. As featured in this exhibition, Lehtola's series Marked
Skin presents some of Finland's most heavily tattooed people and what
most would likely consider a grotesque urge to decorate and mark oneself
for life. Whether young or old, Lehtola's tattooed people share the
transgression of the human body by piercing and tattooing. As someone's
individual bodily boundaries are overstepped, he also enters a subcultural
community. By no means is it a specifically Finnish phenomenon but
part of a global subculture, a way of creating new affiliations in
times when older communities are crumbling. The desire expressed in
piercing and tattooing culture, to arrive at new forms of "authentic
identity", surfaces in a world that is anything but authentic and
homogeneous, in which traditional points of identification are under
threat.
In other series of photographs Lehtola has reported on society's fringe
groups: in Young Heroes (1995-96), teenagers and their drunken binges.
Or other young people farther on the margins of society, as in his
latest series: detached exposures of burn marks on T-shirts and jeans
left when the young drug abusers dozed off from the numbing effect
of heroin.
Jouko Lehtola's mapping of different subcultures shares a kinship
with the photography of Norwegian artist Torbjørn Rødland. In his
BLACK project on exhibit for the first time, like much of the other
work in CLOCKWISE Rødland investigates one of the Nordic regions´
most extreme and controversial subcultures: the death metal music
scene. In the early 1990s Norwegian Black Metal became a phenomenon
of the international underground. The sound is fast and complex, the
lyrics inspired by Satanism and pre-Christian mythology. It expresses
a worldview that consciously worships evil and the dark forces within
the individual and in the Nordic heritage.
In Norway, criminal acts perpetrated by the musicians have overshadowed
their bands' musical accomplishments. Not surprisingly, as followers
and practitioners since 1992 have burned down 40 ancient stave churches.
Eight members of the black metal scene have received prison sentences,
including two for murder. For Rødland, the fascination lies not in
the scandals raging around the musicians, but in the mythological
Nordic images that tie into Norwegian Black Metal. "Having done a
lot of work focusing on beauty, purity, innocence, LIGHT it was
interesting for me to go into the woods with the devil," Rødland says,
as an artist who once focused on our images of a pristine Nordic landscape.
BLACK consists of portraits of four musicians from the Norwegian black
metal scene bearing the stage names of Frost, Fenriz, Abbath and Infernus.
Although each of these figures has a powerful personal history, it
makes sense to see the young legends as metaphors of other, more fundamental
Nordic stories. In embodying an to the public alarming fascination
of neo-Nazi mental baggage, Norse Asa faith and black metal, Frost,
Fenriz, Abbath and Infernus trigger images in us of what, in Rødland's
words, it means to be "evil and Nordic". In that respect, the photographs
allude to a Romantic horror vision of a repressed, dark, demonic spirituality,
presumably smoldering beneath our well-adjusted Nordic welfare models
and "wholesome" brands such as Nokia, Bang & Olufsen, Ikea and Ericsson.
BLACK submits the notion that, on the flipside of global Nike culture,
a unique Nordic demonology lurks.
Both Rødland and Lehtola report on communities that are expressions
of a "willed" anti-modernity. They depict individuals reacting to
society's rationalization, disciplining and internationalization by
reaching partway back to the pre-modern. Their works express a longing
to return to the ritual ecstasy and authenticity of the tribe, to
arrive at a ³modern tribalism" reflecting a pre-national cohesion
within a group and a globalized subculture.
APPROACHING FROM ANOTHER ANGLE, the French/Danish artist Colonel (formerly
Thierry Geoffroy) has for several years worked with different mappings
of the worlds of art and culture. Thus, he has reflected on the perceived
existence of a unique, authentic, national identity, and the caricatured
foreigner's idea of cultural assimilation. His production shares a
kinship with Lehtola's and Rødland's in the sense that he uses his
subject area, whether an art institution or the Danish nation, as
anthropological site. However, in Colonel the subcultural is not central.
Instead, he deals with "the ordinary Dane" and specific cultural areas
that he maps out with a focus on intolerance, misguided kindness and
hypocrisy. Humor is an important ingredient in fragmentary works that
quite matter-of-factly show us the artist as cultural anthropologist
or "funny sociologist", as he prefers it.
The exhibition features two Colonel videos, I Want to Look Danish,
I Want to Look Like You (1999) and Invisible to the Oculist Witnesses
(1999), both thematizing integration and differences, as well as the
art project L'imperméable (1990-2002). Colonel is an exponent of a
distinctly process-oriented and dialogical art that does not kowtow
to art-historical requirements for beauty and genre divisions, but
instead offers the viewer new forms of communication by moving into
the social sphere through long-term activities. His L'imperméable
project exemplifies this practice. It consists of a number of coats
printed with text and images, coats the artist has worn in various
art contexts: walking around Paris, at biennials around the world
or in videos such as Invisible to the Oculist Witnesses in this exhibition.
L'imperméable is part of Moving Exhibitions, an unfinishable mobile
project, critical of institutions, which has both a conceptual aim:
creating new strategies for the artwork and the exhibition situation,
and an existential aim: Colonel creates his own personal "cabinet
of wonders" of internally connected stories about himself, his art
and the world around him which, it is likely, no one but the artist
himself can connect with respect to all interfaces and historics.
Colonel's practice is manifested as a type of transcategorical art
that gathers inspiration from ethnography, anthropology, journalism
and cultural theory. It points out that, although art may not be the
best didactic tool, humorous-artistic language still holds a potential
for penetrating into cracks that are beyond the reach of didactic
statements. His is an art that, apart from its fragmentary nature,
its many piled-on details, its humor and irony, follows a clear, productive
strategy, centered as it is on an interest in charting various forms
of ideological, cultural and social representation.
Amel Ibrahimovic, who like Colonel lives in Denmark, presents a related
mapping, both critical of institutions and existential. In Ibrahimovic's
drawings, the nation-state mindset and commercial and media-exposed
soccer culture meet the art world. The drawings represent well-known
artists and gallery owners in different "team lineups" or "idol portraits".
Almost like an outside cultural anthropologist observing an isolated
ethnic grouping, Ibrahimovic lays bare the largely predictable maps
of the contemporary art world. Like Colonel, Ibrahimovic seems less
concerned with the formal aspects of the artwork than in how and why
art reaches its audience.
THE OTHER ARTISTS IN THE EXHIBITION, Lilibeth Cuenca Rasmussen, Melek
Mazici, Khaled D. Ramadan, Simone Aaberg Kærn and Marco Evaristti,
in their various ways operate within the same sets of problems as
the above artists. They work with their own culture or with an existential
coming-to-terms with themselves as products of mobility, cultural
encounters, regional-global consciousness, international subcultures
and modernity's still current ambivalence of otherness and self. The
exhibition clearly reveals globalization's inherent duality of local
and global dynamics. On one hand, the artists are exponents of a relativization
of local and national frames of reference, and all express themselves
in an international formal language. But that is not to say that their
works do not simultaneously recognize and explore local cultural characteristics
and, thus, also either mirror or reflect on how consciousness of the
global situation increases the attention on local or, at least, existential
and regional distinctions. At the same time, the exhibition illustrates
the complexity of the global situation, characterized not just by
the conflict and co-existence of the global and the local, but by
the establishment of various international subcultures which, in highly
different ways, can be used to forge new, post-national affiliations.
Moreover, the work of these artists recognizes how individuals, in
a world where traditional geographic hierarchies and borders are in
rapid transformation, time and again are forced to navigate according
to their own experiences. In that sense, the works turn in on themselves,
contemplating cultural self-understanding not for the purpose of
creating new nationalistic-romantic monuments, but as the efforts
of melancholy ethnographers alternating cool detachment with societally
oriented engagement.
MAJOR THANKS GO TO ALL THE ARTISTS: Lilibeth Cuenca Rasmussen, Melek
Mazici, Simone Aaberg Kærn, Marco Evaristti, Torbjørn Rødland, Khaled
D. Ramadan, Jouko Lehtola, Colonel and Amel Ibrahimovic. They engage
themselves in our mutual social and existential reality, and ask us
to do the same.
Stine Høholt, Curator, ARKEN Museum of Modern Art, Denmark
 

|