Tal R
What is your relationship to the tradition of painting?
Well, there are two ways for me to answer that. First
of all, I am always looking for nutrition for my paintings.
However, I hardly ever get the material from other paintings.
In fact, I am not out after pleasure when looking at paintings.
I read them rather superficially, finding out how they
are done, not technically, but how things are moved on
the canvas. I get my stuff from almost everything but
art, simply from things that surround me, which catch
my eye or imagination.
The way I work is like a soup man. I constantly have
this hotpot boiling and I throw all kinds of material
into it, you know, personal experiences and things that
interest me, for example, a record sleeve or the title
of an album. I look for different patterns of working,
and am constantly trying out new mixes and ways of combining
things. Basically, what I try to do, for example, is to
paint how a train goes into a tunnel. It is as simple
as that.
The second way to answer this is to refer to artists
or things that have inspired me. Here I first have to
say that I believe we are all victims of our childhood.
Growing up in the 1970s I got to know all those images.
Then later on, of course, I hated them. But then again,
all of a sudden, I developed this extremely sentimental
attitude towards them. Currently I am trying to get rid
of these images. I have promised myself that I will never
again use an image of women demonstrating with their breasts
bare.
But to get to the point, I find Marcel Broodthaers quite
wonderful. I really enjoy his weird kind of humor. It
is perhaps because I am so naive, but some photos really
can pull my pants down. And if we think about Pop art,
I like the looser kind of stuff, nerdy Pop art, like Sigmar
Polke, not the real stuff. I really like Polke, because
at the time they were done, they seemed like mistakes,
but now they still have a freshness that most Pop art
has lost.
But if you really want to know what blows my mind, it
is the stuff I saw on TV recently. It was a kind of nature
program about shrimps that live in these almost closed
shells underwater. Ways of life that have been developing
over the last 30,000 years, and in comparison with that,
the history of art is just a silly fart. But these shrimps
are amazing, with all kinds of worms trying to get into
their secret shells. It is like a real underwater society.
The possibilities of painting?
Painting is a zombie medium. As a painter you are a little
bit like a guy showing up in a tiger suit at a techno
party. So your dress code is outdated, but you might still
have the best moves on the dance floor.
Personally speaking, painting is a language through which
I can get a lot of experience both in and out. But to
tell you the truth, it is a complicated medium, it is
and remains a puzzle to me. It is not a necessary medium
anymore, but somehow so many people still keep on painting.
Then again, it suits me and I like the flatness of a surface.
I desperately need that flatness to tell my stories, because
otherwise they are too weird and unfocused.
What kinds of stories do you mean?
For me, at least, the things I really like and enjoy
are not necessarily things I understand. Thus, my stories
are not clear-cut, but quite strange, even if they can
be pretty straightforward. One good example is a painting
I just finished. It shows a woman sitting in a forest
at night. There are birds flying around. It started with
the desire to paint birds in the night. In the finished
result they look like bats, which, I guess, is both the
failure and the thrill of this painting.
You use two kinds of working strategies. One is a
classical way of placing paintings on a wall, and another
is making a collage and an installation. Can you say something
about this combination?
For me there is no difference. It is just a matter of
working structure. In both cases, the focus is on the
material. As with the suit-case model, in which I travel
with most of the material with me, it is about working
in layers, adding stuff, and then pulling things off and
erasing them. And this is the same whether I work alone
or with a group of students. It is the basic painting
experience. The funny thing is that I do not consider
myself to be too good with the brush, but the more I make
paintings, the better I get at finding those important
detours and sidetracks within the painting.
What do you read?
Lately I have been through a lot of books about tea,
especially green tea. Then I began again on one of my
favourite novels, Knut Hamsun's Pan, which I have already
read five times.
The question of time in painting?
Well, contrary to what one might believe, the more skilled
I have become in painting, the more time it takes to do
them. In the actual act of painting, the workload is OK,
but it takes a lot of thinking and pondering before I
start. And a lot of sleeping in the studio. Making paintings
has become more complicated, because I am now more sure
of myself, and I am more ready to explore possibilities,
to take risks and find those sidetracks.
The role of the artist?
I don't know. But I can tell you that as a painter who
simply had fun making paintings, I did feel bad for a
long time. I really did envy artists who dealt directly
with social issues. Then later on when I saw more of these
works, I figured that they are actually the real painters.
I became disappointed. Quite often these good citizens
use social issues as if they were paint and brush, and
organize them into big paintings. But to be serious, I
think the role of an artist is to make people's lives
a little more complicated.
Do you think you have succeeded?
No. Anyhow, I don't think I am the future of art. I consider
myself like somebody who sings ballads, those stupid songs
about being in love in the woods.
Autobiographical elements in your works?
I would prefer there to be less of them, but it is always
a mirror situation. I never take or use images straight
from my own life. I collect, use and abuse them from the
world outside my personality. Honestly speaking, my starting
points are embarrassingly private, but I am a master of
cheap lies. I can easily turn failed love into falling
objects, like in my painting called Downhill.
Mika Hannula
|

Tal R
Moon Star and Planets
1999
Oil paint on canvas
200 x 200
Collection Stephan Landwehr,
Berlin
Photo: Jochen Littkemann

Tal R
Lord Tanger
2000
Oil on canvas
200 x 200
Courtesy of Contemporary Fine Arts,
Berlin
Photo: Jochen Littkemann
|